WILLIAM LEE OWENS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 1981-05-13
No. 81-726
RYDER, Acting C. J., and DANAHY and CAMPBELL, JJ., concur.
397 So. 2d 1235 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1981)

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Mr. Owens has raised a question concerning the admissibility of certain impeachment evidence. It has repeatedly been held that relief under rule 3.850 is not available as to any matters which could have been raised by direct appeal. Falagan v. State, 267 So. 2d 109 (Fla.2d DCA 1972); Mitchell v. State, 381 So. 2d 760 (Fla.5th DCA 1980).

RYDER, Acting C. J., and DANAHY and CAMPBELL, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw