JAMES
v.
UNITED STATES
JAMES
UNITED STATES
16 F.2d 125
United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit (1926)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed — as to proof of another offense, on authority of Moore v. U. S., 150 U. S. 57, 61, 14 S. Ct. 26, 37 L. Ed. 996; Tucker v. U. S. (C. C. A. 6) 224 F. 833, 840; De Witt v. U. S. (C. C. A. 6) 291 F. 995, 1002; as to variance affeeting the fourth count, on authority of Claassen v. U. S., 142 U. S. 140, 12 S. Ct. 169, 35 L. Ed. 966, and Bullock v. U. S. (C. C. A. 6) 289 F. 29, 31; as to restriction of cross-examination, because within the discretion of the trial judge.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Cajiafas v. United States, 38 F.2d 3 (6th Cir. 1930)
Authorities Cited
- Claassen v. United States, 142 U.S. 140 (U.S. 1891)
- Schuyler Nat'l Bank v. Bollong, 150 U.S. 90 (U.S. 1893)
- Moore v. United States, 150 U.S. 57 (U.S. 1893)