MARGARET N. HERNANDEZ, ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF ARTURO HERNANDEZ-MEJIA, APPELLANT,
v.
THOMAS E. ROBERTSON, COMMISSIONER OF PATENTS, APPELLEE
MARGARET N. HERNANDEZ, ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF ARTURO HERNANDEZ-MEJIA, APPELLANT,
THOMAS E. ROBERTSON, COMMISSIONER OF PATENTS, APPELLEE
16 F.2d 279
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit (1926)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 8 cases
Opinion of the Court
We are unable to agree with the appellant that there was any error in the conclusion announced in the successive decisions of the Primary Examiner of the Patent Office, of the Board of Examiners in Chief, of the Commissioner of Patents, of the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia (298 F. 1019, 54 App. D. C. 404), and of the District Court for the District of Maryland (16 F.[2d] 276).
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Campbell v. Galeno Chem. Co. et. al., 281 U.S. 599 (U.S. 1930)
-
Lion Labs., Inc. v. Campbell, 34 F.2d 642 (2d Cir. 1929)
-
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Robertson, 25 F.2d 833 (4th Cir. 1928)
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence