GEORGE BADGER, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Clerical Error In Sentencing cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Appellant was convicted by a jury of armed robbery. At sentencing, the trial judge announced in open court that “it is the judgment of this Court that George Badger be committed to the custody of the Department of Corrections of the State of Florida to be imprisoned for a term of ten years.... ” However, the written order of judgment and sentence provided that defendant be imprisoned for a term of fifteen years with credit for time served. This is a variance which was addressed in Gatti v. State, 324 So. 2d 193 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975), and we remand with directions to the trial court to correct the apparent clerical error. The appellant pro se urges other reversible error which we have examined and find to be without merit. We therefore affirm and remand with directions.
AFFIRMED and REMANDED with directions.
ERVIN, J., and LILES, WOODIE A. (Retired), and PEARSON, TILLMAN (Retired), Associate Judges, concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (18 total)
-
In the Interest of S.N.W. v. S.C.W. & Dep't of Child. & Fam. Servs., 912 So. 2d 368 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005)…it for mandamus, prohibition, or certio-rari. We conclude the order is a final order as to Adoption Miracles and thus subject to appeal. See M.A.M. v. Viscount, 848 So. 2d 1258 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003); Citibank, N.A. v. Blackhawk Heating & Plumbing Co., 398 So. 2d 984 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981). Because the Department of Children and Family Services concedes that the trial court was required to permit Adoption Miracles to intervene pursuant to section 63.082(6)(b), Florida Statutes (2004), we reverse.1 Further, as the D…
-
Vanguard Ins. Co. v. Townsend, 544 So. 2d 1153 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989)…ill gain or'lose by the legal operation and effect of the judgment. Morgareidge v. Howey, 75 Fla. 234, 78 So. 14 (Fla.1918); Miracle House Corporation v. Haige, 96 So. 2d 417 (Fla.1957); Citibank, N.A., v. Blackhawk Heating & Plumbing Company, Inc., 398 So. 2d 984 [*1156] (Fla. 4th DCA 1981). This is because, although Vanguard does not expressly say so in its appellate brief, Vanguard as a surety and “privy” of its insured, may be bound by collateral estoppel or res judica-ta as to issues tried in this tort s…
-
Superior Fence & Rail OF N. Fla. v. Lucas, 35 So. 3d 104 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010)…es seeking to intervene. In re S.N.W., 912 So. 2d at 370; J.R. v. R.M., 679 So. 2d 64, 65 n. 1 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996); see also City of Dania v. Broward County, 658 So. 2d 163, 164 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995); Citibank N.A. v. Blackhawk Heating & Plumbing Co., 398 So. 2d 984, 986 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981). We recede from our prior case law holding that the denial of a motion to intervene is reviewable by certiorari. Instead, we hold that the denial of a motion to intervene is reviewable by appeal.1 AFFIRMED. MONACO, C.J., G…
Previewing 3 of 18 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Gatti v. State, 324 So. 2d 193 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975)