ROGER LEON TYKOWSKI, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Amado Evarito Garcia v. Stewart, 906 So. 2d 1117 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005)
  …invoke the jurisdiction of the court to adjudicate its right to the funds. The trial court was therefore without jurisdiction to disburse the funds so that its order disbursing the funds was void. See Lovett, 112 So. at 776; Defreitas v. Defreitas, 398 So. 2d 991, 992 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981); Bartolucci v. McKay, 428 So. 2d 378, 379 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983). A void final order or judgment may be attacked under rule 1.540(b). Because the March 26, 2003 order was void, we reverse the April 8, 2004 order denying the mo…
• Todaro v. Todaro, 704 So. 2d 138 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997)
  …mproperly determined matters that were not the subject of the pleadings. Under Florida law, a trial court is without jurisdiction to “hear and determine matters which are not the subject of appropriate pleadings and notice.” Defreitas v. Defreitas, 398 So. 2d 991, 992 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981); see Johnson v. Johnson, 546 So. 2d 97, 98 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989); Cooper v. Cooper, 406 So. 2d 1223, 1224 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981). However, when issues not raised by the pleadings are tried by implied consent, they are to be treat…
• In re The Est. of Helena Hatcher v. Dodd, 439 So. 2d 977 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983)
  …l court lacks jurisdiction to hear and to determine matters which are not the subject of proper pleading2 and notice. Bartolucci v. McKay, 428 So. 2d 378 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983); Fine v. Fine, 400 So. 2d 1254 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981); Defreitas v. Defreitas, 398 So. 2d 991 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981). In short: If a court should render a judgment in a case where it had jurisdiction of the parties, upon a matter entirely outside of the issues made, it would, of necessity, be arbitrary and unjust as being outside the jurisdict…