ELLERY DEAN EDWARDS AND TEDDY DEAN SMITH, APPELLANTS,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Defendants are not eligible for mandatory youthful offender treatment if previously found guilty of a felony other than the one for which they are currently being sentenced.
[1] A defendant is excluded from mandatory classification under the Youthful Offender Act if, prior to sentencing, the defendant has been found guilty of a felony other than…
[2] A defendant previously found guilty of a felony, even if sentenced simultaneously with other offenses, is ineligible for mandatory youthful offender treatment.
Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAppellants pleaded guilty to attempted armed robbery, false imprisonment, and aggravated assault. They appealed their sentences, arguing they should h…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Prior Felony Convictions cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Edwards and Smith appeal the sentences entered against them following their plea of guilty to charges of attempted armed robbery and false imprisonment. Edwards also appeals the sentence entered against him following his plea of guilty to the additional charge of aggravated assault with a firearm. They contend the trial court erred in failing to sentence them as youthful offenders under Section 958.04, Florida Statutes (1979). We affirm.
Smith was adjudged guilty of attempted armed robbery and unlawful imprisonment simultaneously and then sentenced. Similarly, Edwards was adjudged guilty of attempted armed robbery, false imprisonment, and aggravated assault with a firearm simultaneously and then sentenced. We find this case indistinguishable from this court’s prior decision in Goodson v. State, 392 So. 2d 1335 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980), which held that a defendant did not qualify for treatment under the mandatory provisions of the Youthful Offender Act because he had been “previously found guilty of a felony” under the provisions of Section 958.-04(2)(a), since he had been adjudicated guilty of two robberies based on previous pleas of guilty before he was sentenced on both charges. Therefore at the time of sentencing, the defendant had been found guilty of a felony other than the felony qualifying him under the Act. The same reasoning applies here and the appellants’ sentences are accordingly affirmed.
However, since we view this opinion as one passing upon a question of great public importance, Fla.R.App.P. Rule 9.030 (a)(2)(a)(v), we join Goodson, Barnhill v. State, 393 So. 2d 557 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981), and Abram v. State (Fla. 1st DCA 1981), 1981 FLW 879, No. TT-193, opinion April 14, 1981, by certifying the following question to the Supreme Court of Florida:
Is a person excluded from mandatory classification under Section 958.04(2)(a), Florida Statutes (1979) when prior to sentencing the offender has been found guilty of a qualifying felony under the Act and has simultaneously been found guilty of other felonies?
ROBERT P. SMITH, Jr., LARRY G. SMITH and JOANOS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Ellery Dean Edwards v. State, 406 So. 2d 1119 (Fla. 1981)…PER CURIAM. The certified question having been answered in the affirmative in State v. Goodson, 403 So. 2d 1337 (Fla.1981), the decision of the district court is approved, 399 So. 2d 124. It is so ordered. ADKINS, Acting C. J., and BOYD, OVERTON, ALDERMAN and MCDONALD, JJ., concur.…
Authorities Cited
- Goodson v. State, 392 So. 2d 1335 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980)
- Chatman v. State, 393 So. 2d 557 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980)
- Barnhill v. State, 393 So. 2d 557 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980)