EMIL MORTON, TRUSTEE, D/B/A MORTON TOWERS, APPELLANT,
v.
LEO GOLDMAN, MARTIN B. HERMAN, MARGARET. VARSA, JENNIE BROSTEN, AND HARRY LESSER, ON BEHALF OF THEMSELVES AND ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, APPELLEES
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Waiver Of Rights cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
The judgments under review by appeal and cross-appeal in these consolidated cases are affirmed. See Forte Towers, Inc. v. City of Miami Beach, 360 So. 2d 81 (Fla.3d DCA 1978), cert. denied, 370 So. 2d 459 (Fla. 1979); see also Muss v. City of Miami Beach, 339 So. 2d 236 (Fla.3d DCA 1976), cert. denied, 348 So. 2d 950 (Fla.1977); Lifschitz v. City of Miami Beach, 339 So. 2d 232 (Fla.3d DCA 1976), cert. denied, 348 So. 2d 949 (Fla.1977). The contention of the intervening tenants in their cross-appeal that the landlord, who did not file a registration statement pursuant to the provisions of the rent stabilization ordinance, had thereby waived any rights under the ordinance, is rejected in light of the special master’s correct conclusion, adopted by the trial court, that an order entered upon stipulation of the City 'of Miami Beach and the landlord nearly three years before the tenants intervened, which called for the landlord to protect the tenants by posting, which he did, a security bond, supplanted the necessity of registration under the ordinance.
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Town OF Ponce Inlet v. Edmond R. Rancourt and Paula Rancourt, 627 So. 2d 586 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993)…iance is the presence of an exceptional and unique hardship. The hardship cannot be self created. Josephson v. Autrey, 96 So. 2d 784 (Fla.1957). The hardship cannot be one of mere economic disadvantage. See Metropolitan Dade County v. Reineng Corp., 399 So. 2d 379 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); Burger King v. Metropolitan Dade County, 349 So. 2d 210 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977), appeal dism’d., 355 So. 2d 512 (Fla.1978). No evidence was presented to the Board of Adjustment in the instant case other than the neighbors’ letters sh…
-
Cnty. OF Volusia v. Consol. Pre-Stressed Concrete, Inc., 653 So. 2d 398 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995)…on any appeal” taken from the Planning and Zoning Commission and hear testimony of witnesses and other evidence. Thus the Orange County Zoning Act clearly provided for an “appeal” by trial de novo. See also Metropolitan Dade County v. Reineng Corp., 399 So. 2d 379 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981) (Metropolitan Dade County Code provided for a de novo hearing upon appeal from the Zoning Appeals Board to the County Commission). In Carnegie v. Department of Public Safety, 60 So. 2d 728 (Fla.1952), the Florida Supreme Court he…
Authorities Cited
- Lifschitz v. City OF Miami Beach, 339 So. 2d 232 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976)
- Forte Towers, Inc. v. City OF Miami Beach, 360 So. 2d 81 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978)
- Muss v. City OF Miami Beach, 339 So. 2d 236 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976)