CITY OF DETROIT
v.
JULIEN
CITY OF DETROIT
JULIEN
21 F.2d 830
United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit (1927)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 22 cases
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed. Defendant’s motion to direct, made, at the close of plaintiff’s evidence, was waived by putting in proof without renewal of the motion; and, in any event, there was substantial evidence to support the verdict. The doctors’ evidence was, in substance, an expression of expert opinion as to the probability of permanence in the injury. A deduction of an unknown amount on account of pain and suffering must be made from the verdict; and hence no one can say that so much as was compensation for lack of earning power was excessive.
Let the mandate issue forthwith.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (11 total)
-
United States v. Page, 302 F.2d 81 (9th Cir. 1962)
-
Kovach v. United States, 53 F.2d 639 (6th Cir. 1931)
-
United States v. Bianco, 96 F.2d 97 (2d Cir. 1938)
Previewing 3 of 11 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence