ROSEMARY T. HOUSE, APPELLANT,
v.
HUGH A. HOUSE, APPELLEE
ROSEMARY T. HOUSE, APPELLANT,
HUGH A. HOUSE, APPELLEE
399 So. 2d 1025
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1981)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We hold that the trial court had the discretion to order that fees and costs totalling $18,504.59 awarded to the wife’s attorney be paid over a period of approximately thirty (30) months, Harder v. Harder, 331 So. 2d 341 (Fla. 2d DCA), cert. den., 342 So. 2d 1101 (Fla.1976), and that no abuse of that discretion is shown on the record before us.
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Sammons v. Sammons, 479 So. 2d 223 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985)…t the jurisdictional defect, the judgment below could not be upheld as, in effect, an appropriate judgment for partition because neither the complaint nor the evidence complied with the requirements of Chap. 64, Fla.Stat. (1983), see Smith v. Smith, 399 So. 2d 1025 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); Sanders v. Sanders, 351 So. 2d 1126 (Fla. 2d DCA 1977); O’Hara, Ms. Sammons is of course free to seek such relief after remand. Since the Colorado dissolution has rendered the couple tenants in common of the property previously h…
-
Young, Stern & Tannenbaum, P.A. v. Ernst, 453 So. 2d 99 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984)…red so as not to deplete or jeopardize the assets remaining with the husband in order that he might have the ability to earn the sums necessary to pay the deferred portion of lump sum alimony and [*103] the attorney’s fees and costs. House v. House, 399 So. 2d 1025 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); Harder v. Harder, 331 So. 2d 341 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976); Flipse v. Flipse, 305 So. 2d 16 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975). We find no abuse of discretion in the exercise of this power under the circumstances as found in the final judgment of diss…
-
Arlyne S. Gallow v. Gallow, 497 So. 2d 1288 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986)…amount in favor of the appellant,1 and against the appellee, or in retaining jurisdiction to enforce said award against future earnings of the appellee. See Young, Stern & Tannenbaum, P.A. v. Ernst, 453 So. 2d 99 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984); House v. House, 399 So. 2d 1025 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); Harder v. Harder, 331 So. 2d 341 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976); Flipse v. Flipse, 305 So. 2d 16 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975). Therefore we return the matter to the trial court for the purpose of making such disposition of the award. Reversed and re…
Authorities Cited
- Harder v. Harder, 331 So. 2d 341 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976)