HOWARD F. WILDS, JR., APPELLANT,
v.
VIRGINIA H. WILDS, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1981-06-09
No. 80-1272
Before BARKDULL and DANIEL S. PEARSON and FERGUSON, JJ.
399 So. 2d 1038 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1981) Caution
Cited by 23 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

It is not necessary that one spouse be completely unable to pay attorney’s fees in order to require the other spouse to pay the fees. An award of attorney’s fees may be proper to avoid an inequitable diminution of other fiscal sums granted to the wife. Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So. 2d 1197 (Fla.1980). The record brought forward by the appellant is inadequate to demonstrate reversible error. Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150 (Fla.1979).

Affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By (23 total)

  • Cordis Corp. v. Prooslin, 482 So. 2d 486 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986)
    …(4) that the granting of a temporary injunction will not disserve the public interest.2 E.g., Graham v. Edwards, 472 So. 2d 803, 806 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985); Department of Business Regulation, Division of Alcoholic Beverages & Tobacco v. Provende, Inc., 399 So. 2d 1038, 1041 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981). In the context of covenants not to compete or not to divulge trade secrets, this general rule has been relaxed so that irreparable injury may be presumed. Capraro v. Lanier Business Products, Inc., 466 So. 2d 212 (Fla.1985)…
  • Graham v. Edwards, 472 So. 2d 803 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985)
    …merits, (c) that the threatened injury to petitioner outweighs any possible harm to the respondent and, (d) that the granting of preliminary injunction will not deceive [sic] the public interest. Department of Business Regulation v. Provende, Inc., 399 So. 2d 1038, 1041 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); see Oxford International Bank and Trust, Ltd. v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 374 So. 2d 54 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979), cert. dismissed, 383 So. 2d 1199 (Fla.1980); State, Department of Health and Rehabilitative Ser…
  • …(f) Preliminary injunctive relief is clearly in the public interest, and the failure to grant such relief would result in further injury to the public. Wilson v. Sandstrom, 317 So. 2d 732 (Fla.1975); Dept. of Business Regulation v. Provende, Inc., 399 So. 2d 1038 (Fla.3d DCA 1981). Based upon these findings, the trial court ordered, in pertinent part, the following injunctive relief: (a) The aforesaid Defendants shall forthwith jointly retain the services of Enviropact, Inc., as the primary consultant and…

Previewing 3 of 23 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw