JACK O. CRUM, APPELLANT,

v.

THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Alderman v. BCI Eng'rs & Scientists, Inc., 68 So. 3d 396 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011)
  …ere is an issue of fact concerning whether a professional has met the standard of care, it is error to grant a summary judgment. Estate of Rotell ex rel. Rotell v. Kuehnle, 38 So. 3d 783, 790 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010); Stuyvesant Ins. Co. v. Square D. Co., 399 So. 2d 1102, 1104 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); Schauer v. Blair Constr. Co., 374 So. 2d 1160, 1161-62 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979). Because the circuit court expressly declined to address any of the other grounds asserted in BCI’s motion for summary judgment, we do not address t…
• Sanchez v. Acapulco Plasters & Stucco & Fla. Home Builders, 668 So. 2d 298 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996)
  …ative intent to the contrary is express, clear and manifest. Homemakers, Inc. v. Gonzales, 400 So. 2d 965 (Fla.1981); Dade County v. Ferro, 384 So. 2d 1283 (Fla.1980); Foley v. Morris, 339 So. 2d 215 (Fla.1976); Stuyvesant Ins. Co. v. Square D. Co., 399 So. 2d 1102 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981). See also Timmeny v. Tropical Botanicals Corp., 615 So. 2d 811 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993) (Florida statute providing that limitations period on workers’ compensation claims shall not be tolled or extended by employer’s failure to file no…
• Meir v. Kirk, 561 So. 2d 399 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990)
  …974). This has been the result where other Florida courts have addressed similar situations and refused to find section 95.11 retroactive despite the existence of the section 95.022 savings clause. See, e.g., Stuyvesant Ins. Co. v. Square D Company, 399 So. 2d 1102 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); Garofalo v. Community Hospital of South Broward, 382 So. 2d 722 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980); and Brooks v. Cerrato, 355 So. 2d 119 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978). We therefore conclude that the savings clause in section 95.022 did not express any…

Authorities Cited

• Istvan J. Ersek v. State, 238 So. 2d 481 (Fla. 3d DCA 1970)