AMERICAN SURETY CO. OF NEW YORK
v.
JACKSON

9th Cir. | 1928-05-07
No. 5324
Before GILBERT, RUDKIN, and DIETRICH, Circuit Judges.
26 F.2d 248 United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (1928) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

[1,2] The appellee has petitioned for a rehearing upon two grounds: First, because the court did not consider or determine the effect of a preferred claim in the sum of $800 in favor of one Jeffries, arising out of a special deposit dissipated by the bank; and, second, because the court did not specify or define the issues to be retried. The first question was not considered or decided by the court below, and for that reason was not considered by this court, and the granting of a new trial reopens every issue in the case except as to questions definitely and finally determined by the appellate court.

Petition denied.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw