FITZGERALD
v.
DODSON ET AL.
In these eases the application for writs of error is based on the refusal of the trial court to grant a new trial.
[1,2] It is settled law in this court that the action of the trial court in granting or refusing a new trial is not reviewable. Columbia Ry. Co. v. Cruit, 20 App. D. C. 521; Price v. United States, 14 App. D. C. 391; Kelly v. Moore, 22 App. D. C. 9. Even where the motion for a new trial is based upon newly discovered evidence, the action of the trial court will not be disturbed, unless there has been a manifest abuse of discretion. Mandes v. Midgett, 49 App. D. C. 139, 261 F. 1019.
It results that these applications must be denied.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Hamilton v. United States, 140 F.2d 679 (D.C. Cir. 1944)
-
United States v. Downing, 51 F.2d 1030 (2d Cir. 1931)
-
Kenyon v. Youngman (D.D.C. 1930)
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence