GEORGE W. RICE ET AL., DEFENDANTS, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR,
v.
UNITED STATES, DEFENDANT IN ERROR
GEORGE W. RICE ET AL., DEFENDANTS, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR,
UNITED STATES, DEFENDANT IN ERROR
27 F.2d 129
United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit (1928)
Negative Treatment
Cited by 17 cases
Opinion of the Court
The United States has filed a motion for rehearing since the announcement of our opinion in the above ease. 24 F.(2d) 479.
In Murby v. United States, 293 F. 849, where the proceedings were under and by virtue of a search warrant, this court held that “what would have happened, or have been found, if the officers had proceeded without process, is a matter of pure conjecture, in which we need not indulge," to whieh we adhere.
It will be noted, also, that in the present case search and seizure was not made as incidental to the arrest, but that the arrest was made following the search and seizure.
Petition is denied.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (17 total)
-
Olivier Straw Goods Corp. v. Osaka Shosen Kaisha, 47 F.2d 878 (2d Cir. 1931)
-
Aunt Jemima Mills Co. v. Belge, 34 F.2d 120 (2d Cir. 1929)
-
Freedman v. THE m/s Concordia Star, 250 F.2d 867 (2d Cir. 1958)
Previewing 3 of 17 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Rice v. United States, 24 F.2d 479 (1st Cir. 1928)