FRANCIS P. CONROY, ET AL., ETC.,
v.
CARDELE BROWER, ET AL., ETC.
At the oral argument this case and the case of Milton Weiss, et al. v. Herberta Leonardy, et al., were consolidated and argued together. The latter case was decided this date. The parties were different and both cases arose from a different source but they were prosecuted under Section 87.01, Florida Statutes 1941, for a common purpose and a similar decree resulted. The questions raised in this case are similar to those presented in Milton Weiss, et al., v. Herberta Leonardy, et al., so the judgment appealed from is affirmed on authority of the latter case.
Affirmed.
THOMAS, C. J., CHAPMAN, ADAMS and HOBSON, JJ., concur.
SEBRING and BARNS, JJ., dissent.
dissenting:
I dissent upon the basis stated in my dissenting opinion in Milton Weiss, et al., v. Herberta Leonardy, et al., this day decided.
BARNS, J.,
dissenting:
I dissent upon the basis stated in my dissenting opinion in Milton Weiss, et al., v. Herberta Leonardy, et al., this day decided.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Simons v. Miami Beach First Nat'l Bank, 157 So. 2d 199 (Fla. 3d DCA 1963)…in the divorce suit, and the chancellor was eminently correct in holding she was not entitled to maintain the present suit to set aside the decree for those reasons. Mabson v. Mabson, 104 Fla. 162, 140 So. 801; Bernstein v. Bernstein, 160 Fla. 654, 36 So. 2d 190; MacFadden v. Muckerman, Fla.App.1959, 116 So. 2d 448. The prior New York separate maintenance decree was not a bar to a divorce suit by the husband, and his failure to disclose it in his complaint was not a fraud on the court. Matsis v. Matsis, 15…
-
Bernstein v. Bernstein, 160 Fla. 968 (Fla. 1948)…MELVIN M. BERNSTEIN v. FLORENCE BERNSTEIN 36 So. 2nd 190 July 13, 1948 Rehearing denied Sept. 28, 1948. Fall Terra, 1948 Division A Affirmed.…
-
Levine v. Levine, 6 Fla. Supp. 54 (Dade Cty. Cir. Ct. 1954)…nce for herself and the two minor children of the parties. Such attorney advises in the mentioned letter that in such proceedings the court has enjoined the husband from further prosecuting this suit in this court. In Bernstein v. Bernstein (Fla.), 36 So. 2d 190, our Supreme Court held that the filing in court of a letter from the defendant’s attorney detailing certain facts involved in support proceedings in another state between the parties was sufficient to bring such procéedings to the chancellor’s atte…