PROCTOR H. DOUGHERTY, SIDNEY TALIAFERRO, AND J. FRANKLIN BELL, COMMISSIONERS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, APPELLANTS,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA EX REL. HUGH MCDERMOTT, APPELLEE
PROCTOR H. DOUGHERTY, SIDNEY TALIAFERRO, AND J. FRANKLIN BELL, COMMISSIONERS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, APPELLANTS,
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA EX REL. HUGH MCDERMOTT, APPELLEE
30 F.2d 474
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia (1928)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 8 cases
Opinion of the Court
This is an appeal from a judgment in the Supreme Court of the" District in a mandamus proceeding growing out of substantially the same facts and involving the same questions that were involved in the ease just decided. 58 App. D. C. 308, 30 F.(2d) 471.
For the reasons stated in that opinion, the judgment in this case is affirmed, with costs.
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States v. McDONALD, 481 F.2d 513 (D.C. Cir. 1973)
-
United States v. Durant, 648 F.2d 747 (D.C. Cir. 1981)
-
Wilson v. United States (D.D.C. 1952)
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Dougherty v. United States ex rel. Roberts (D.D.C. 1929)