ACME, PALMERS & DE MOOY FOUNDRY CO.
v.
HARRY H. WEISS, FORMERLY U. S. COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE
ACME, PALMERS & DE MOOY FOUNDRY CO.
HARRY H. WEISS, FORMERLY U. S. COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE
30 F.2d 1007
United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit (1928)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
Judgment of District Court affirmed, with costs, on authority of Law v. U. S., 266 U. S. 494, 45 S. Ct. 175, 69 L. Ed. 401, Fleischmann Co. v. U. S., 270 U. S. 349, 46 S. Ct. 284, 70 L. Ed. 624, Oyler v. Railway Co., 16 F.(2d) 455, and Frankie Bros. Co. v. Routzahn, 26 F.(2d) 1018.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
MAY v. Marbury, 39 F.2d 438 (6th Cir. 1930)
-
In re Taylor (E.D. Mich. 1931)
Authorities Cited
- Fleischmann Constr. Co. v. United States to the Use of Forsberg, 270 U.S. 349 (U.S. 1926)
- LAW v. United States, 266 U.S. 494 (U.S. 1925)
- Oyler v. Cleveland, 16 F.2d 455 (6th Cir. 1926)
- Reid v. Steam Tug Dispatch, 26 F.2d 1018 (2d Cir. 1928)
- Gargano v. United States, 26 F.2d 1018 (2d Cir. 1928)