W. H. LONG & CO., INC., APPELLANT,
v.
MAURICE CAMPBELL, FEDERAL PROHIBITION ADMINISTRATOR FOR THE SECOND DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, ET AL., APPELLEES; W. H. LONG & CO., INC., APPELLEE, V. MAURICE CAMPBELL, FEDERAL PROHIBITION ADMINISTRATOR FOR THE SECOND DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, AND JAMES M. DORAN, FEDERAL PROHIBITION COMMISSIONER OF THE UNITED STATES, APPELLANTS
W. H. LONG & CO., INC., APPELLANT,
MAURICE CAMPBELL, FEDERAL PROHIBITION ADMINISTRATOR FOR THE SECOND DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, ET AL., APPELLEES; W. H. LONG & CO., INC., APPELLEE, V. MAURICE CAMPBELL, FEDERAL PROHIBITION ADMINISTRATOR FOR THE SECOND DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, AND JAMES M. DORAN, FEDERAL PROHIBITION COMMISSIONER OF THE UNITED STATES, APPELLANTS
34 F.2d 645
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (1929)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
The decree in this case is affirmed as to the defendants’ appeal on the authority of Lion Laboratories v. Campbell, 34 F.(2d) 642, handed down herewith; as to the plaintiff’s appeal, on the authority of Higgins v. Mills, 22 F.(2d) 913, (C. C. A. 2).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Campbell v. W. H. Long & Co., 281 U.S. 610 (U.S. 1930)
-
Doran v. Bay State Distrib. Corp., 36 F.2d 657 (1st Cir. 1929)
-
Triborough Chem. Corp. v. Doran (E.D.N.Y. 1930)
Authorities Cited
- Lion Labs., Inc. v. Campbell, 34 F.2d 642 (2d Cir. 1929)
- Higgins v. Mills, 22 F.2d 913 (2d Cir. 1927)
- W. H. Long & Co., Inc. v. Campbell (S.D.N.Y. 1928)