BETTY FASANO, APPELLANT,

v.

DIEBOLD, INC., APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Nahar v. Oral Mildred Jap-A-Joe Nahar, 656 So. 2d 225 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995)
  …decrees of a foreign jurisdiction, subject to limited exceptions. . Seymour v. Seymour, 85 So. 2d 726, 727 (Fla.1956); Sanchez v. Sanchez De Davila, 547 So. 2d 943, 945 (Fla. 3d DCA), rev. denied, 554 So. 2d 1168 (Fla.1989); In re Solnik’s Estate, 401 So. 2d 896, 897 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981). . Sanchez v. Sanchez De Davila, 547 So. 2d 943 (Fla. 3d DCA), rev. denied, 554 So. 2d 1168 (Fla.1989). . As previously noted, the antenuptial agreement did not prohibit the husband from setting up a trust fund, as here, f…
• Sanchez v. Zary Maria Sanchez de Davila, 547 So. 2d 943 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989)
  …bstantive law, it is undisputed that the beneficiaries of a Totten trust are entitled to the proceeds of the subject bank account upon the death of the creator of the trust. Seymour v. Seymour, 85 So. 2d 726, 727 (Fla.1956); In re Estate of Solnick, 401 So. 2d 896, 897 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981). Plainly, then, the appellant sons, as the beneficiaries of the subject Totten trust, are entitled to the funds in the said trusts — not all the children of the decedent, as the trial court ruled. The final summary judgment…
• Kelley v. Hill, 481 So. 2d 1311 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986)
  …as to the proper construction of sections 732.201 and 732.206, Florida Statutes (1983) under the facts of this case. We do not agree as we find the principles here indistinguishable from those enunciated in In Re: The Estate of Max Solnik, Deceased, 401 So. 2d 896 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981). The record before us establishes that appellant and decedent were married on July 27, 1978. Both parties were previously married and their former spouses were deceased. They both brought certain real and personal property into…

Authorities Cited

• Driscoll v. Morris, 114 So. 2d 314 (Fla. 3d DCA 1959)
• Emmett Reeder v. Edward M. Chadbourne, Inc., 338 So. 2d 271 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976)