UNITED STATES, APPELLANT,
v.
HENRY A. JENSEN, APPELLEE; UNITED STATES, APPELLANT, V. KENNETH E. BANKS, APPELLEE; UNITED STATES, APPELLANT, V. DEWEY R. SALISBURY, AS ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF CHESTER L. SALISBURY, DECEASED, APPELLEE
UNITED STATES, APPELLANT,
HENRY A. JENSEN, APPELLEE; UNITED STATES, APPELLANT, V. KENNETH E. BANKS, APPELLEE; UNITED STATES, APPELLANT, V. DEWEY R. SALISBURY, AS ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF CHESTER L. SALISBURY, DECEASED, APPELLEE
36 F.2d 47
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (1929)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
The sole question presented by the appeals in these three actions, brought upon converted war risk insurance policies, is whether or not these policies beeame incontestable where a total loss occurred within six months after the issuance of the new policy. This question is answered in the negative in the opinion this day rendered in James W. Jordan v. United States of America, 36 F. (2d) 43.
Judgments reversed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Thompson v. City of Houma, 76 F.2d 793 (5th Cir. 1935)
-
Byrd v. United States, 106 F.2d 821 (10th Cir. 1939)
-
United States v. Fleming, 115 F.2d 314 (5th Cir. 1940)
Authorities Cited
- Jordan v. United States, 36 F.2d 43 (9th Cir. 1929)