THE STATE OF FLORIDA, EX REL. ROBERT G. EMERSON, ROBERT E. MILLER AND WALLACE BENEDICT, RELATORS,
v.
JOHN R. BEACHAM, GEORGE O. BUTLER, E. B. DONNELL, J. L. EARMAN AND VINCENT OAKSMITH, AS AND CONSTITUTING THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH, IN PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND FRED W. MILLER AS TAX ASSESSOR OF SAID CITY, AND E. C. RUMSEY AS TAX COLLECTOR OF SAID CITY, RESPONDENTS

Fla. | 1931-10-21
103 Fla. 198 Florida Supreme Court (1931)
Also reported at: 137 So. 524

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

The Florida Supreme Court sustained demurrers to an alternative writ of mandamus, allowing relators to amend their writ to focus on statutory and ordinance duties, excluding a recent legislative amendment.


Holding

The court sustained the demurrers, finding that the relators could amend their writ to focus on duties prescribed by statutes and city ordinances, excluding the provisions of a 1931 amendment to the city's charter.


Key Quotes

“it is considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said demurrers be and the same are hereby sustained with leave to the Relators to amend the Alternative Writ with respect to the duties sought to be enforced against the City Commission and the City Tax Assessor of the City of West Palm Beach as prescribed by the statutes of the State and by the City ordinances of the City of West Palm Beach and without reference to and in disregard of the provisions of Chapter 15855, Laws of Florida, Acts of 1931, amending the Charter of the City of West Palm Beach.”

This quote details the court's decision to sustain the demurrers and the conditions for amendment.

Facts & Procedural History

Relators sought a writ of mandamus to compel certain city officials to perform specific duties. The respondents filed demurrers to the alternative wri…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

This cause coming on to be heard upon demurrers of the Respondents to the Alternative Writ of Mandamus, and the Court having considered such demurrers upon briefs and argument' of counsel for the respective parties, it is considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said demurrers be and the same are hereby sustained with leave to the Relators to amend the Alternative Writ with respect to the duties sought to be enforced against the City Commission and the City Tax Assessor of the City of West Palm Beach as prescribed by the statutes of the State and by the City ordinances of the City of West Palm Beach and without reference to and in disregard of the provisions of Chapter 15855, Laws of Florida, Acts of 1931, amending the Charter of the City of West Palm Beach.

Buford, C.J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Terrell, Brown and Davis, J.J., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw