ROGER JONES, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Logan Finney v. State, 420 So. 2d 639 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982)
  …ress to be dispositive of the case. Accord, Alexander v. State, 399 So. 2d 110 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981); Snell v. State, 388 So. 2d 1353, 1354, n. 2 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980); Oesterle v. State, 382 So. 2d 1293 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980). This court, in Sune v. State, 402 So. 2d 11 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981), recognized that if there had been evidence of a stipulation between counsel, it would be appropriate to reach the merits. This decision is not contrary to Brown v. State, 376 So. 2d 382 (Fla.1979) where the court expressed concer…
• State v. Carr, 438 So. 2d 826 (Fla. 1983)
  …PER CURIAM. This is a petition to review Carr v. State, 421 So. 2d 1098 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982), on the ground that it conflicts with Puccio v. State, 424 So. 2d 85 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); Sune v. State, 402 So. 2d 11 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); Alexander v. State, 399 So. 2d 110 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981); and Hardison v. State, 385 So. 2d 738 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980). We agree there is conflict and find jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. Respondent Carr was charged in a…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Vaughn v. State, 711 So. 2d 64 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998)
  …d as a result of the wiretap. Applying the correct legal test of dispositiveness, we conclude that the trial court’s ruling on appellant’s motion to suppress evidence acquired as a result of the wiretap was not dispositive. See, e.g., Sune v. State, 402 So. 2d 11 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981) (motion to suppress recordings of conversations not dis-positive because evidence to same effect was available through witness testimony); Campbell v. State, 386 So. 2d 629 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980) (motion to suppress evidence not dis-…

Authorities Cited

• Tascano v. State, 393 So. 2d 540 (Fla. 1980)