ERNEST THOMAS, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1981-06-30
No. 81-1225
Before BARKDULL, NESBITT and FERGUSON, JJ.
402 So. 2d 18 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1981) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g), appeals from the summary denial of his motion for post conviction relief under Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850. This is the second time this case has been before this court on appeal from a denial of motion to vacate pursuant to Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850.1 The argument raises five points on appeal; they are all basically a reargument of the first appeal and are hereby summarily denied on the authority of Doerr v. State, 275 So. 2d 592 (Fla. 4th DCA 1973); Clements v. State, 310 So. 2d 420 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975); Neal v. State, 349 So. 2d 844 (Fla. 2d DCA 1977).

Affirmed.

. See: Thomas v. State, 390 So. 2d 104 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Thomas v. Dugger, 846 F.2d 669 (11th Cir. 1988)
    …fore ineffective; and (3) that the plea hearing was highly irregular, as evidenced by Thomas' many contradictory statements in response to the court's inquiries. This motion was denied by the trial court and the denial was affirmed. Thomas v. State, 402 So. 2d 18 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981). 3 On October 5, 1981, Thomas filed a habeas corpus petition with the state appellate court, claiming that the court had applied the wrong standard of review to his case. This petition was denied on October 9, 198L 4. On Novembe…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw