SENTINEL CO.
v.
DINWIDDIE
SENTINEL CO.
DINWIDDIE
41 F.2d 57
United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit (1930)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
Appellee brought this action to recover damages occasioned by appellant’s publicaH°n an alleged libel. The verdict of the 3my m appellee’s favor was, on his motion, ^ aside as inadequate and a new trial granted. This appeal is from the order granting the new trial.
Appellee moves this court to dismiss the appeal because the order is not an appealable one. Upon the authority of Dry Dock E. B. & B. R. Co. v. Petkunas (C. C. A.) 261 F. 988; Wright v. Taft-Peirce Mfg. Co. (C. C. A.) 287 F. 131; and Fort Dodge Portland *58Cement Corp. v. Monk (C. C. A.) 276 F. 113, the motion must he granted.
The appeal is dismissed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Ford Motor Co. v. Busam Motor Sales, Inc., 185 F.2d 531 (6th Cir. 1950)
-
Hunt v. United States, 53 F.2d 333 (10th Cir. 1931)
-
Long v. Davis, 169 F.2d 982 (9th Cir. 1948)