JACK J. WEISS, CAROLINE WEISS, CALAZ, N. V., APPELLANTS,
v.
ROBERT TIERNEY, APPELLEE
JACK J. WEISS, CAROLINE WEISS, CALAZ, N. V., APPELLANTS,
ROBERT TIERNEY, APPELLEE
402 So. 2d 1239
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1981)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Upon consideration of the appeal and the cross-appeal, we affirm the Final Judgment and the Corrected Final Judgment in favor of appellee Tierney with regard to liability, but we reverse the amount of the damage award. Under the express terms of the contract, appellee is entitled to recover $100,000. We therefore remand the cause for entry of a final judgment reflecting this opinion.
Affirmed in part, reversed in part.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Vessel Described AS ONE 36 Foot Mirage v. State, 487 So. 2d 1134 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986)…A 1983). However, evidence is admissible in light of the fact that the seizing officer saw and smelled marijuana residue without even boarding the boat. Thus, McGilvary had probable cause to search the boat without a search warrant. Gomez v. State, 402 So. 2d 1239 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1981).” The appellant urges that the trial court erred in denying his motion to dismiss the forfeiture proceeding because the search and seizure of the boat was conducted without a warrant and no exception to the warrant requirement a…1 / 2
-
German A. Gomez and Florentino Molina v. State, 437 So. 2d 206 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983)…the offense was properly denied by the trial court because the ground urged in support thereof could only be urged on a sworn motion to dismiss under Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.190(c)(4) or on a motion for judgment of acquittal at trial.”1 See Gomez v. State, 402 So. 2d 1239, 1240 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981). Second, they alternatively alleged that their trial counsel, “by entering into a plea agreement calling for an appeal of an unappealable issue, rendered ineffective legal representation.” There is clearly no defect in the…1 / 2