CORRUGATING MACHINERY CORPORATION AND S. & S. CORRUGATING PAPER MACHINERY CO., INC., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
EMPIRE CORRUGATED CONTAINER CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-APPELLEE; CORRUGATING MACHINERY CORPORATION AND S. & S. CORRUGATING PAPER MACHINERY CO., INC., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, V. PROGRESSIVE CORRUGATED PAPER MACHINERY CO., INC., DEFENDANT-APPELLEE
CORRUGATING MACHINERY CORPORATION AND S. & S. CORRUGATING PAPER MACHINERY CO., INC., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
EMPIRE CORRUGATED CONTAINER CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-APPELLEE; CORRUGATING MACHINERY CORPORATION AND S. & S. CORRUGATING PAPER MACHINERY CO., INC., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, V. PROGRESSIVE CORRUGATED PAPER MACHINERY CO., INC., DEFENDANT-APPELLEE
47 F.2d 276
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (1931)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
Decrees [Corrugating Machinery Corporation v. Progressive Corrugated Paper Machinery Co., 47 F.(2d) 273] affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
D. Ginsberg & Sons, Inc. v. Popkin, 285 U.S. 204 (U.S. 1932)
-
In re Foster Const. Corp. Popkin v. D. Ginsberg & Sons, Inc., 49 F.2d 213 (2d Cir. 1931)