NANCY E. MAY AND NATIONWIDE MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLANTS,

v.

HELEN E. WILLIAMS, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Mandy v. Williams, 492 So. 2d 759 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986)
  …a dissolution of marriage action are absolutely fixed and vested at the time of entry of the final judgment of dissolution, the trial court cannot thereafter modify those rights. Finston v. Finston, 160 Fla. 935, 37 So. 2d 423 (1948); Neal v. Neal, 403 So. 2d 621 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981), rev. denied, 412 So. 2d 467 (Fla. 1982); Horton v. Horton, 330 So. 2d 69 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976); Sistrunk v. Sistrunk, 235 So. 2d 53 (Fla. 4th DCA 1970). We find particularly applicable to the present facts this court’s decision in…
• Kuhnke v. Kuhnke, 556 So. 2d 1121 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989)
  …tion agreement and final judgment of dissolution granting the wife the option to purchase the marital home conferred a vested property right which was not subject to modification. Finston v. Finston, 160 Fla. 935, 37 So. 2d 423 (1948); Neal v. Neal, 403 So. 2d 621 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981), review denied, 412 So. 2d 467 (Fla.1982). Applying that principle here, we conclude that the Kuhnke agreement property provisions confer vested property rights rather than child custody or support. In the absence of allegations…
• Sheila v. McCUTCHEON, 928 So. 2d 364 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006)
  …ement and final judgment of dissolution granting the wife the option to purchase the marital home conferred a vested property right which was not subject to modification. See also Finston v. Finston, 160 Fla. 935, 37 So. 2d 423 (1948); Neal v. Neal, 403 So. 2d 621 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981). Thus, I agree with the majority that the parties’ agreement, including the provisions for extensions of time, is not subject to modification. However, in requesting additional time, the former wife was not seeking to rewrite th…

Authorities Cited

• John M. Purdy and his wife v. Gulf Breeze Enters., Inc., 403 So. 2d 1325 (Fla. 1981)