THE MOTOR VESSEL K-22845
THE MOTOR VESSEL K-22845
United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (1931)
Opinion of the Court
The exceptions to the report of the special commissioner have been examined and are overruled. The intervener has not pursued the remedy prescribed in 27 USCA § 40, and no other basis of claim is asserted. Motion to confirm report, and directing payment of commissioner’s fees and disbursements is granted. Settle order.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited (17 total)
- The Lottawanna, 21 Wall. 558 (U.S. 1874)
- Richbourg Motor Co. v. United States, 281 U.S. 528 (U.S. 1930)
- The J. E. Rumbell, 148 U.S. 1 (U.S. 1893)
- Miller v. United States, 11 Wall. 268 (U.S. 1870)
- The Rio Grande, 23 Wall. 458 (U.S. 1874)
- THE Brig ANN, 9 Cranch 289 (U.S. 1815)
- The St. Jago de Cuba. Vinente, 9 Wheat. 409 (U.S. 1824)
- The Spray (D.R.I. 1925)
- United States v. ONE Cadillac Town CAR Auto., 18 F.2d 1005 (D.C. Cir. 1927)
- THE MOTOR BOAT NO. L-7869, 21 F.2d 594 (3d Cir. 1927)