ROBERT S. PETTUS, APPELLANT,
v.
MARJORIE K. DINGWALL F/K/A MARJORIE K. PETTUS, APPELLEE

Fla. 4th DCA | 1981-10-07
No. 81-99
BERANEK and HERSEY, JJ., and OWEN, WILLIAM C., Jr., Retired, Associate Judge, concur.
404 So. 2d 414 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1981)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The appellate court affirmed the trial court's order on child support modification because the record was insufficient to demonstrate reversible error.


Facts & Procedural History

The trial court considered issues of child support, but a court reporter was absent for a crucial hearing, and the parties stipulated to use the entir…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order on petition and coimterpetition for modification of child support. We affirm primarily due to the state of the record.

The issues before the trial court related to the needs and abilities of both parties regarding child support. Although extensive testimony was taken, a court reporter was not present for the crucial hearing. In addition, the parties failed to prepare a statement under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.200(b)(3), choosing, instead, to enter into a stipulation whereby this court should consider the entire trial court file, including unfiled correspondence and memoranda, as the record on appeal. The stipulation provides that the facts in these documents should be considered as a “statement of facts” except where conflicting, in which case the findings in the judgment are to be considered as the facts.

On the basis of this record, we are unable to conclude that the trial court committed reversible error and we, therefore affirm. See Kauffmann v. Baker, 392 So. 2d 13 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980); Baker v. Baker, 366 So. 2d 873 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979).

AFFIRMED.

BERANEK and HERSEY, JJ., and OWEN, WILLIAM C., Jr., Retired, Associate Judge, concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw