ALBERT H. SAKOLSKY, D/B/A THE COCONUT GROVE HOTEL, DAVID HILL, AND T.P.I. CORPORATION, A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLANTS,
v.
THE CITY OF MIAMI, A FLORIDA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, GROVE KEY MARINA, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION AND GROVE RESTAURANT LTD., A FLORIDA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, SPENCER B. MEREDITH, AS GENERAL PARTNER OF GROVE RESTAURANT LTD. AND J. RICHARD BELL, AS GENERAL PARTNER OF GROVE RESTAURANT LTD., APPELLEES

Fla. 3d DCA | 1981-09-29
No. 80-2473
Before HUBBART, C. J., and HENDRY and NESBITT, JJ.
404 So. 2d 782 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1981) Caution
Cited by 12 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Local No. 284, United Assoc, of Journeyman and Apprentices of Plumbing & Pipefitting Industry v. Henley & Beckwith, Inc., 66 So. 2d 818, 821-822 (Fla.1953); New Products Corp. v. City of North Miami, 241 So. 2d 451 (Fla.3d DCA 1970), cert. denied, 244 So. 2d 434 (Fla.1971).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By (12 total)

  • …1026, 1028 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985). . We noted in Crown the existence of some dissatisfaction among the courts with the latent ambiguity-patent ambiguity dichotomy and agreed with the comments of Royal Continental Hotels, Inc. v. Broward Vending, Inc., 404 So. 2d 782, 784 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981), that parol evidence should be admissible "irrespective of any technical classification of the type of ambiguity present." 452 So. 2d at 52. However, we continued to "adhere to the distinction inasmuch as the rule is still i…
  • Crown Mgmt. Corp. v. Goodman, 452 So. 2d 49 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984)
    …f authority indicates that the introduction of parol evidence to probe the true intent of the parties is proper, irrespective of any technical classification of the type of ambiguity present. Royal Continental Hotels, Inc. v. Broward Vending, Inc., 404 So. 2d 782, 784 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981). We tend to agree with the Fourth District’s comments, but we must adhere to the distinction inasmuch as the rule is still in existence. See First Guaranty Corp. v. Palmer Bank and Trust Co., 405 So. 2d 186 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981…
  • Lambert v. The Berkley S. Condo. Ass'n, Inc., 680 So. 2d 588 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996)
    …. E.g., Everglade Lumber Co. v. Nettleton Lumber Co., 111 Fla. 333,149 So. 736 (1933); Kraft v. Mason, 668 So. 2d 679 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996); Gorman v. Kelly, 658 So. 2d 1049 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995); Royal Continental Hotels, Inc. v. Broward Vending, Inc., 404 So. 2d 782 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981). Whether a document is ambiguous depends upon whether it is reasonably susceptible to more than one interpretation. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. De Londono, 511 So. 2d 604 (Fla. 3d DCA), rev. dismissed, 519 So. 2d 988 (Fla.…

Previewing 3 of 12 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw