PRINTY E. LEPPLA, APPELLANT,
v.
NORMAN C. LEPPLA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Dissolution Of Marriage cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
In the final judgment of dissolution of marriage on appeal, the trial court failed to set forth the determination of which party would make the mortgage payments and bear the expenses for repair and maintenance on the marital home. We remand for the trial judge to make such determination. If the trial judge should determine that the wife is to make all such payments, exclusive of the husband, provisions shall be made for increasing her equity in the property. Rubino v. Rubino, 372 So. 2d 539 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979).
We have considered the other points raised in this appeal and find them to be without merit.
Accordingly, this cause is AFFIRMED in part and REVERSED and REMANDED in part for further proceedings in accordance with this opinion.
McCORD and MILLS, JJ., and AGNER, ROYCE, Associate Judge, concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Harris v. Walbridge, 488 So. 2d 881 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986)…nd and the wife as is required by the statute. They are in law estopped by their conduct to impeach the mortgage upon the facts shown by the record. At 531. A recent decision out of a sister court, Raymar Development Corporation v. [*884] Barbara, 404 So. 2d 813 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981), wherein the trial court refused to foreclose a mortgage because the mortgagors had not signed it before a notary public, reversed the trial court with instructions to amend the judgment to order foreclosure of the mortgage for th…
Authorities Cited
- Rubino v. Rubino, 372 So. 2d 539 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979)