WALTER S. HUTCHINS, APPELLANT,
v.
HARRY WARDMAN, THOMAS P. BONES, AND JAMES D. HOBBS, APPELLEES
WALTER S. HUTCHINS, APPELLANT,
HARRY WARDMAN, THOMAS P. BONES, AND JAMES D. HOBBS, APPELLEES
United States District Court for the District of Columbia (1932)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
This ease was argued and submitted together with Cafritz Construction Co. v. Robert Mudrick and Fredy Mudrick, 61 App. D. C. 189, 59 F. (2d) 864, and involves the same issue this day decided by ns therein. Consistently with our decision in that caso the judgment of the, lower court herein is reversed with costs, and this cause is remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent herewith.
ROBB, Associate Justice, dissents.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Magruder v. Supplee et ux., 316 U.S. 394 (U.S. 1942)
-
Nunan v. Green, 146 F.2d 352 (8th Cir. 1945)
-
Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Rust's Estate, 116 F.2d 636 (4th Cir. 1940)
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Cafritz Const. Co. v. Mudrick (D.D.C. 1932)