PATRICIA A. MORGAN, APPELLANT,
v.
WILLIAM A. MORGAN, JR., APPELLEE
PATRICIA A. MORGAN, APPELLANT,
WILLIAM A. MORGAN, JR., APPELLEE
404 So. 2d 1101
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1981)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. The general rule is that a judgment or decree wholly in favor of a party cannot be appealed by [her], since [she] is not aggrieved thereby. 3 Fla. Jur.2d, Appellate Review § 19 (1978). The appellant received exactly the relief requested. Accordingly, the Order under review is affirmed. Lovett v. Lovett, 93 Fla. 611, 112 So. 768 (1927); North Shore Bank v. Town of Surfside, 72 So. 2d 659 (Fla.1954).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Colonnade 101 SE, Inc. v. Mireya Cristina Cambero Cordero, 194 So. 3d 446 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016)…ve grounds or to hold an evidentiary hearing which would be required to adjudicate the substantive grounds raised in the motion. We affirm because, under the order on review^ appellants received exactly the relief they requested. Morgan v. Morgan, 404 So. 2d 1101 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981). We reject appellants’ contention on appeal that the trial court was obligated to adjudicate the alternative substantive grounds asserted by appellants in their motion. Having granted appellants the relief they requested in their…
Authorities Cited
- Lovett v. Lovett, 112 So. 768 (Fla. 1927)
- N. Shore Bank v. Town of Surfside, 72 So. 2d 659 (Fla. 1954)