TODD EDWIN HYDE, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
PER CURIAM.
On Hyde’s appeal from a judgment of conviction entered on his nolo con-tendere plea, reserving the right to appeal the court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence of Hyde’s field of growing mari juana plants, we find the search did not offend Fourth Amendment standards and that the court properly denied the suppression motion. However, there being no available record showing that the nolo con-tendere plea was accepted by the court after the required inquiries to Hyde, Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.170(j), 3.172, Hyde was free to withdraw his plea and the court erred in failing to allow withdrawal. The judgment must be vacated and the case remanded for further proceedings.
REVERSED.
ROBERT P. SMITH, Jr., C.J., and McCORD and MILLS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Terence Timothy Harden v. State, 453 So. 2d 550 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984)…ts and determinations required by this Rule. Until that time, it may be withdrawn by either party without any necessary justification. [Emphasis added.] Until formal acceptance has occurred, the plea binds no one: not the defendant, Hyde v. State, 405 So. 2d 445 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981), the prosecutor, State v. Reasbeck, 359 So. 2d 564 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978) or the court, State ex rel. Wilhoit v. Wells, 356 So. 2d 817 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978). [*551] The State argues that acceptance of the pleas can be inferred from th…
-
Caristi v. State, 578 So. 2d 769 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991)…oreover, a trial court’s failure to comply with the requirements of rules 3.170 and 3.172 during the acceptance of the plea agreement and sentencing are valid grounds for reversal on a direct appeal of the judgment and sentence, e.g., Hyde v. State, 405 So. 2d 445 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981), rev. denied, 412 So. 2d 466 (Fla.1982); Scheller v. State, 327 So. 2d 876 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976), provided there is a showing of prejudice to the defendant pursuant to rule 3.172(i), and such objections are first timely presented to…
-
Hyde v. State, 438 So. 2d 1078 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983)…vesting that quantity of marijuana.” On appeal, appellant’s conviction and sentence were reversed because the trial court had failed to comply with Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure 3.170(j) and 3.172 in accepting appellant’s plea. Hyde v. State, 405 So. 2d 445 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983). Following remand, appellant received a jury trial during which he testified that he had discovered the plants growing on his land about five weeks prior to his arrest. He testified that he wasn’t sure what the plants were, so he…
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence