W. B. LEONARD, APPELLANT,

v.

SANN LEONARD, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Fennema v. The Howard Johnson Co., 559 So. 2d 1231 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990)
  …nce with subsection (2) provides an inventory of effects not tendered and accepted pursuant to subsection (1). In either event, if the proper procedures are followed, the hotel’s liability is limited to $1,000.” Great American Ins. Co. v. Coppedge, 405 So. 2d 732, 735 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981), rev. denied, 415 So. 2d 1359 (Fla.1982). It does not follow, however, that an innkeeper may, under all circumstances, rely on the above statute to limit his liability even if the statute is properly posted at the inn. In N…
• Fla. Sonesta Corp. v. Aniballi, 463 So. 2d 1203 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985)
  …of property which it accepts for safekeeping. If a hotel accepts property for safekeeping but does not follow the procedures outlined in the statute, it cannot claim the benefit of a limitation of liability. Great American Insurance Co. v. Coppedge, 405 So. 2d 732, 735 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981), pet. for rev. denied, 415 So. 2d 1359 (Fla.1982). The statute provides that a hotel is under no obligation to accept property for safekeeping, and may refuse to accept those valuables in excess of $1,000, but affirmative co…
• Leonard v. Sann Leonard, 408 So. 2d 1091 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982)
  …im from receiving meaningful review of that issue in the Supreme Court. Although in this appeal the husband challenged the authority of the trial court to award the temporary alimony, and by our affirmance we have obviously rejected such contention, 405 So. 2d 732, we are of the view that the issue as to whether the husband would be entitled to credit has not yet been resolved by an appropriate order of the trial court. The motion for stay of mandate is denied. DOWNEY, ANSTEAD and HURLEY, JJ., concur.…

Authorities Cited

• Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So. 2d 1197 (Fla. 1980)