STATE OF FLORIDA, EX REL. KENT CORPORATION, A CORPORATION OF FLORIDA
v.
CITY OF FORT LAUDERDALE, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF FLORIDA, ET AL.
STATE OF FLORIDA, EX REL. KENT CORPORATION, A CORPORATION OF FLORIDA
CITY OF FORT LAUDERDALE, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF FLORIDA, ET AL.
160 Fla. 903
Florida Supreme Court (1948)
Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 37 So. 2d 253
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
This judgment is affirmed upon authority of State of Florida, ex rel., Kent Corporation, a corporation of Florida v. Board of County Commissioners of Broward County, a body corporate, et al., this day filed.
THOMAS, C. J., ADAMS, BARNS and HOBSON, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State v. Hodges, 169 So. 2d 359 (Fla. 3d DCA 1963)…ainly appear. * * * ” Smith v. Presha, 101 Fla. 1272, 134 So. 44. In this instance the very length of the question defeats its purpose. It is difficult, if not impossible for the reader to keep its contents in mind. As was said in Pawley v. Pawley, 160 Fla. 903, 37 So. 2d 247, 248: “It often happens that such ‘questions’ are stated at such length and in such detail as to serve no useful purpose. The rule does not contemplate that a briefer, in stating a ‘question’ will attempt to import into the question…
-
Germaine Urban v. City OF Daytona Beach, 101 So. 2d 414 (Fla. 1st DCA 1958)…s of the rules such as this, either with or without consent of opposing counsel. It is so ordered. STURGIS, C. J., and CARROLL, DONALD K., J., concur. . Rule 3.3, F.A.R. . See: Bolick v. Sperry, Fla.1955, 82 So. 2d 374. . See: Pawley v. Pawley, 160 Fla. 903, 37 So. 2d 247; Coult v. McIntosh Inv. Co., 126 Fla. 864, 171 So. 793.…