HAROLD C. VANSCYOC, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1981-11-03
No. 81-2185
Before HUBBART, C. J., and HENDRY and SCHWARTZ, JJ.
405 So. 2d 1033 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1981) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner, pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.140(g), having taken this appeal from the summary denial of his motion for post conviction relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, and this court having considered the record presented and having further determined that it conclusively appears therefrom that petitioner is entitled to no relief, the denial of his motion is affirmed.

Affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Perez v. Hugh S. Unger, M.D., 571 So. 2d 67 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990)
    …rp., 567 So. 2d 992 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990); Clay v. City of Margate, 546 So. 2d 434 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989), rev. denied, 553 So. 2d 1164 (Fla.1989); Zafirakopoulous v. South Miami Int’l Crabhouse, Inc., 513 So. 2d 1353 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); Schemer v. Peck, 405 So. 2d 1033 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981). Accordingly, the judgment under review is reversed. In accordance with Perez’s specific request, the cause is remanded with directions to set the cause for an expeditious trial, forty-five days or more from the return of the m…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw