PAUL FUSILLO, APPELLANT,
v.
GORAL ENTERPRISES, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, D/B/A GORAL PLUMBING, APPELLEE
PAUL FUSILLO, APPELLANT,
GORAL ENTERPRISES, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, D/B/A GORAL PLUMBING, APPELLEE
405 So. 2d 1046
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1981)
Caution
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1980).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Barnett Bank OF Martin Cnty., N.A. v. RGA Dev. Co., 606 So. 2d 1258 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992)…th the majority’s opinion, and to address another matter not discussed. I agree wholeheartedly with the result reached granting the petition. In reaching the decision to grant certio-rari, the majority relies in part on Niles v. County of Volusia, 405 So. 2d 1046 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981), rev. denied, 412 So. 2d 471 (Fla.1982), for the proposition that respondents’ “acceptance of the benefits” theory is inapplicable because that doctrine applies only to final judgments. While I agree “acceptance of the benefits”…1 / 2
Authorities Cited
- Pitcher v. Schneider (Fla. 5th DCA 2018)
- Albert v. Applegate et ux., 377 So. 2d 1150 (Fla. 1979)