WILLIAM PETER JANSEN AND SHARON ROSE JANSEN, D/B/A JANSEN LAND COMPANY, APPELLANTS,
v.
CLIFTON R. DAVIS AND LILLIAN V. DAVIS, APPELLEES
WILLIAM PETER JANSEN AND SHARON ROSE JANSEN, D/B/A JANSEN LAND COMPANY, APPELLANTS,
CLIFTON R. DAVIS AND LILLIAN V. DAVIS, APPELLEES
405 So. 2d 1067
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (1981)
Caution
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
SHARP, Judge.
The Jansens appeal from a summary final judgment in a mortgage foreclosure action.
After a review of the record we find no error committed by the lower court except that there was no affidavit or testimony to support the two hundred three dollar and three cent ($203.03) cost award to the plaintiff. This was conceded in oral argument.
Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed, except the cost item which is stricken.
AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART,
DAUKSCH, C. J., and ORFINGER, J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Grady M. Cooksey, Sr. v. Hartge, 424 So. 2d 989 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983)…OBB, Judge. In response to the motion of appellants, this Court has determined that the order of dismissal herein appealed, which order was executed by the circuit court, on June 29, 1982, is a final, appealable order of dismissal. Calhoun v. Lee, 405 So. 2d 1067 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981); Laytner v. Humble Oil and Refining Co., 262 So. 2d 675 (Fla.1972). Our recent decision in Lawler v. Harris, 418 So. 2d 1239 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982), is distinguishable in that it dealt with the mere granting of a motion, not the act…
-
Kelly v. Torres, 260 So. 3d 410 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018)…the time that judgment issued. A default judgment against one co- defendant, however, is not effective to terminate the cause of action against a co- defendant who was not served with process until after the judgment was rendered. Calhoun v. Lee, 405 So. 2d 1067 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981). Further, the mere entry of a default is not the equivalent of a judgment, nor is it a final disposition: “a default does not affect the status, rights, or liability of a codefendant.” 49 C.J.S. Judgments § 272 (Sep. 2018 up…