GARY JOHN MEISTER, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
GARY JOHN MEISTER, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
405 So. 2d 1069
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (1981)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. Marshall v. State, 381 So. 2d 276 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980); Fitzgerald v. State, 227 So. 2d 45 (Fla.3d DCA 1969).
ORFINGER, COBB and SHARP, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Snider v. Cornelia N. Snider, 686 So. 2d 802 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997)…. Since prohibition is normally the process used to prevent a court from exceeding its jurisdiction, De-Groot v. Sheffield, 95 So. 2d 912 (Fla.1957), a petition for writ of prohibition would also have been appropriate in this case. See King v. Roda, 405 So. 2d 1069 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981).…
-
O'Connor v. O'Connor, 447 So. 2d 1034 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984)…Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130(a)(3)(A). Id. In Bedingfield, we treated an identical appeal as a petition for writ of certiorari. The Fifth District apparently considers such appeals to be petitions for writs of prohibition. King v. Roda, 405 So. 2d 1069 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981). We believe certiorari to be the appropriate remedy. The trial court may only assert subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to the following statute: 61.1308 Jurisdiction.— [*1036] (1) A court of this state which is competent to…
Authorities Cited
- Fitzgerald v. State, 227 So. 2d 45 (Fla. 3d DCA 1969)
- Marshall v. State, 381 So. 2d 276 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980)