LINDA DIANA DEAL, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Probation Revocation cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
After due consideration of the Anders
brief filed on behalf of Appellant and the record, we affirm the revocation of her probation, but we remand the case for correction of the written revocation order. The order is ambiguous because it first indicates that Appellant was found guilty of violating conditions I, III, V, and IX but later states she was found not guilty of violating condition V. Further, the order does not state that Appellant was found not guilty of condition IX. Since at the hearing the court only found that Appellant had violated conditions I and III and had not violated conditions V and IX, it should correct the written revocation order to conform to its oral pronouncement. Rusu v. State, 370 So. 2d 79 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1979); and Towson v. State, 382 So. 2d 870 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980).
. Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
BIR v. State, 493 So. 2d 55 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986)…tions of coercion. Hagans v. State, 492 So. 2d 753 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986); Thomas v. State, 419 So. 2d 1141 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982). AFFIRMED. MILLS and WIGGINTON, JJ., concur. . His direct appeal to this Court resulted in an affirmance in Bir v. State, 405 So. 2d 1073 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981). . Such dialogue was attached to the defendant’s first 3.850 motion which we have examined from this Court’s records in Case No. BK-129 (referred to above).…
Authorities Cited
- Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (U.S. 1967)
- Towson v. State, 382 So. 2d 870 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980)
- Rusu v. State, 370 So. 2d 79 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979)