THOMAS ANKERS, JR., A MINOR, BY AND THROUGH HIS FATHER AND MOTHER, THOMAS ANKERS AND ANN ANKERS, AND THOMAS ANKERS AND ANN ANKERS, INDIVIDUALLY AND JOINTLY, APPELLANTS,
v.
DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD OF PASCO COUNTY, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The District Court of Appeal reversed a dismissal of a negligence complaint brought by a student injured on a bench saw during lunch period at school. The court held that a student's attendance at school sufficiently establishes the relationship between student and school board necessary to support a negligence claim, even if the student was not under direct supervision at the time of injury.
The court held that a student's attendance at school is sufficient to establish the relationship between the student and school board from which a legal duty arises, and that the complaint adequately alleged a negligence cause of action despite not alleging the student was under direct supervision at the time of the accident.
[1] A complaint alleging negligence must establish a relationship between the parties that gives rise to a legal duty on the part of the defendant to protect the plaintiff fr…
[2] A school board has a legal duty to properly supervise student activity, though it is not an insurer against student injuries.
Previewing 2 of 5 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“To sustain a cause of action in negligence, a complaint must allege ultimate facts which establish a relationship between the parties giving rise to a legal duty on the part of the defendant to protect the plaintiff from the injury of which he complains.”
Establishes the foundational requirement for a negligence claim—the existence of a duty arising from a relationship between the parties.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceThomas Ankers, Jr., a student at Land-O-Lakes High School, sustained serious injuries to the fingers of his left hand while working with a bench saw i…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Negligent Maintenance cases and more on FLexlaw
SCHEB, Chief Judge.
This appeal presents one issue: whether appellants’ complaint stated a cause of action for negligence against the appellee school board.
Appellant Thomas Ankers, Jr., and his parents sued the District School Board of Pasco County. Their complaint alleged that Thomas, a student at Land-O-Lakes High School, sustained serious injury to the fingers of his left hand while working with a bench saw in the shop room during his lunch period. These injuries, appellants alleged, resulted from the school board’s negligent maintenance and supervision of the saw and the area surrounding it. Alternatively, the complaint asserted that the appellee school board was negligent in failing to have a teacher present in the area or in failing to prevent students from entering the shop room when instructional personnel were absent, and in failing to instruct students in the use of the saw and related safety equipment.
Appellee moved to dismiss the complaint on ground that it failed to allege facts establishing the relationship between the parties from which the school board’s duty to avoid negligence had arisen. The trial court granted the motion and dismissed the complaint with prejudice. This appeal ensued.
To sustain a cause of action in negligence, a complaint must allege ultimate facts which establish a relationship between the parties giving rise to a legal duty on the part of the defendant to protect the plaintiff from the injury of which he complains. It must also show that the defendant negligently breached that duty, and that the plaintiff’s injury was proximately caused by the defendant’s negligence. Lake Parker Mall, Inc. v. Carson, 327 So. 2d 121 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976); 23 Fla. Jur. Negligence § 101 (1979). The allegation that the minor plaintiff was in attendance at the school when the accident occurred was sufficient to demonstrate the relationship between the school board and Thomas giving rise to a duty. A school board is not an insurer against a student being injured. It is, however, entrusted with the care of the students and has a legal duty to properly supervise student activity. Benton v. School Board of Broward County, 386 So. 2d 831 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980); Barrera v. Dade County School Board, 366 So. 2d 531 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979).
Appellee asserts, as it did in the trial court, that appellants’ complaint is insufficient because it fails to allege that the minor plaintiff was under school supervision at the time of the accident. We disagree. The fact that the complaint did not state that a teacher or other representative of the school board was supervising the plaintiff or that he was undergoing instruction at the time of the accident does not defeat this relationship. A cause of action in negligence encompasses not only negligent acts, but the negligent failure to act as well. Padgett v. School Board of Escambia County, 395 So. 2d 584 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981).
We hold that appellants’ complaint stated a cause of action. Of course, we are not passing on the merits of their claim. Accordingly, we reinstate appellants’ complaint and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
BOARDMAN and OTT, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (12 total)
-
Rupp v. Bryant, 417 So. 2d 658 (Fla. 1982)…ct Toward Pupils, 20 Clev.St.L.Rev. 551 (1971); Annot., 38 A.L.R.3d 830 (1971).20 Florida courts have specifically recognized that a negligent failure to act in carrying out this duty of the school is actionable. See Ankers v. District School Board, 406 So. 2d 72 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981); Padgett v. School Board, 395 So. 2d 584 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981). The genesis of this supervisory duty is based on the school employee standing partially in place of the student’s parents.21 Mandatory schooling has forced parents into…
-
Collins v. The Sch. Bd. OF Broward Cnty., 471 So. 2d 560 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985)…a legal duty on the part of the defendant-teacher to supervise the student; (2) the negligent breach of that duty; and (3) the proximate causation of the student’s injury by the teacher’s negligence. Ankers v. District School Board of Pasco County, 406 So. 2d 72 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981). Without question, the school was obligated to supervise Hammack and his classmates. Although a school board is not an insurer against a student being injured, the school board is entrusted with the care of the students and has a…
-
Rishel v. E. Airlines, Inc., 466 So. 2d 1136 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985)…must allege ultimate facts which establish a .relationship between the parties giving rise to a legal duty on the part of the defendant to protect the plaintiff from the injury of which he complains.” Ankers v. District School Board of Pasco County, 406 So. 2d 72, 73 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981). It follows that if no legal duty exists, there can be no cause of action for negligence. See Price at 1119. Appellants have failed to set forth a cause of action for negligence because, under the fireman’s rule, Eastern had…
Previewing 3 of 12 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Lake Parker Mall, Inc. v. Laurenne A. Carson, 327 So. 2d 121 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976)
- Benton v. The Sch. Bd. OF Broward Cnty., 386 So. 2d 831 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980)
- Padgett v. The Sch. Bd. OF Escambia Cnty., 395 So. 2d 584 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981)
- Jackelyn Barrera v. Dade Cnty. Sch. Bd., 366 So. 2d 531 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979)