RAYMOND RUSSELL FORD, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Jenkins v. State, 269 So. 3d 584 (Fla. 1st DCA 2019)
  …t the original terms of probation were ordered to run concurrently does not mandate that the sentences imposed after violation of probation also run concurrently.” Troncoso v. State, 825 So. 2d 494, 497 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002); accord Ellis v. State, 406 So. 2d 76, 78 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981). Finally, we reject Jenkins’s argument that his consecutive sentences violate double jeopardy. See § 921.16, Fla. Stat. (2005); State v. Cantrell, 417 So. 2d 260, 260 (Fla. 1982). AFFIRMED. LEWIS, WINSOR, and M.K. THOMA…
• Mario v. Troncoso, 825 So. 2d 494 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002)
  …must be imposed [*497] to run concurrently. We disagree.3 The fact that the original terms of probation were ordered to run concurrently does not mandate that the sentences imposed after violation of probation also run concurrently. Ellis v. State, 406 So. 2d 76, 78 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981). Troncoso’s sentence on count four was permissible, however, he is entitled to be re-sentenced on count three. At that time, the court is free to impose either concurrent or consecutive sentences as that was the law prior to B…
• Essie Howard v. State, 141 So. 3d 632 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014)
  …PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See State v. Wayne, 531 So. 2d 160 (Fla.1988); State v. Segarra, 388 So. 2d 1017 (Fla.1980); Means v. State, 779 So. 2d 282 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998); Ellis v. State, 406 So. 2d 76 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981); McCaskill v. State, 728 So. 2d 1183 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999). NORTHCUTT, WALLACE, and CRENSHAW, JJ., Concur.…

Authorities Cited

• Villery v. The Fla. Parole & Prob. Comm'n, 396 So. 2d 1107 (Fla. 1980)
• Norris v. State, 407 So. 2d 997 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981)
• Budget Luxury Inns, Inc. v. Boston, 407 So. 2d 997 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981)