PEDRO M. SARDUY, ET AL., APPELLANTS,

v.

MILTON MARTINEZ, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Walt v. Walt, 574 So. 2d 205 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991)
  …rida court may, and in some circumstances should, determine the custody issue so long as its own exercise of jurisdiction meets the UCCJA’s jurisdictional requirements. In re Adoption of C.L.W., supra; Howard, supra. See also Hernandez v. Hernandez, 406 So. 2d 513 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981). Appellant’s points on appeal are predicated upon provisions of the UCCJA. However, before discussing them, we first address the impact of the father’s choice to proceed in accordance with the law applicable to a habeas corpus pr…
• Newcomb v. Newcomb, 507 So. 2d 1145 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987)
  …“substantially in conformity” with the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act. § 61.1314(1), Fla.Stat. (1985); Hickey v. Baxter, 461 So. 2d 1364 [*1146] (Fla. 1st DCA 1984); Greene v. Greene, 432 So. 2d 62 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); Hernandez v. Hernandez, 406 So. 2d 513 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); see also Al-Fassi v. Al-Fassi, 433 So. 2d 664 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983), review denied, 446 So. 2d 99 (Fla.1984); Bonis v. Bonis, 420 So. 2d 104 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982), review denied, 430 So. 2d 450 (Fla.1983). Reversed and remanded.…
• Herrero v. Matas, 447 So. 2d 335 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984)
  …ll satisfy the test of substantial conformity. Finally, in the absence of any statute, the standard of substantial compliance is satisfied when the court would have had jurisdiction if the other state had enacted the act. See Hernandez v. Hernandez, 406 So. 2d 513 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981) (remanding for hearing on whether Texas exercised jurisdiction in conformity with the act since Texas had not enacted the act). See also [*337] Bergstrom v. Bergstrom, 271 N.W. 2d 546, 551 (N.D.1978); Priscilla S. v. Albert B., 10…

Authorities Cited

• Uhrig v. Redding, 150 Fla. 480 (Fla. 1942)
• Schilpp v. Schilpp, 380 So. 2d 573 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980)
• Perez v. Hernandez, 323 So. 2d 4 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975)