HAZEL A. HENDERSON, ETC., APPELLANT,
v.
GREGORY NEAL HARSIN, ET AL., APPELLEES
HAZEL A. HENDERSON, ETC., APPELLANT,
GREGORY NEAL HARSIN, ET AL., APPELLEES
406 So. 2d 1216
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1981)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 11 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed on authority of Martinez v. State, 76 Fla. 159, 79 So. 751 (1918); Wall v. Little, 102 Fla. 1015, 136 So. 676 (1931); Lambert v. Higgins, 63 So. 2d 631 (Fla.1953); and Riley v. Jackson, 246 So. 2d 625 (Fla. 3d DCA 1971).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (11 total)
-
Martinez v. Scanlan, 582 So. 2d 1167 (Fla. 1991)…n advisory opinion at the instance of parties who show merely the possibility of legal injury on the basis of a hypothetical state of facts which have not arisen and are only contingent, uncertain, and rest in the future. Labella v. Food Fair, Inc., 406 So. 2d 1216 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); see Williams; Bryant; Okaloosa Island Leaseholders Association, Inc. v. Okaloosa Island Authority, 308 So. 2d 120 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975). Nor will Scanlan be able to make such a showing in the future because the legislature, in its…
-
Santa Rosa Cnty. v. Admin. Comm'n, 661 So. 2d 1190 (Fla. 1995)…ory opinion at the instance of parties who show merely the possibility of legal injury on the basis of a hypothetical ‘state of facts which have not arisen’ and are only ‘contingent, uncertain, [and] rest in the future.’” LaBella v. Food Fair, Inc., 406 So. 2d 1216,1217 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981) (quoting Williams v. Howard, 329 So. 2d 277, 283 (Fla. 1976)); see also American Indemnity Co. v. Southern Credit Acceptance, Inc., 147 So. 2d 10, 11 (Fla. 3d DCA 1962) (holding that, in a declaratory action case, “courts may…
-
Olive v. Maas, 811 So. 2d 644 (Fla. 2002)…ance of parties who show merely the possibility of legal injury on the basis of a hypothetical ‘state of facts which have not arisen’ and are only ‘contingent, uncertain, [and] rest in the future.’ ” Id. at 1193 (quoting LaBella v. Food Fair, Inc., 406 So. 2d 1216, 1217 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981)) (emphasis added). It is clear that by the time Olive filed the amended complaint he had acknowledged that he would not sign a contract for representation of Mungin and that Judge Moran had revoked his appointment and appoi…
Previewing 3 of 11 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Wall v. Little, 102 Fla. 1015 (Fla. 1931)
- Lambert v. Higgins, 63 So. 2d 631 (Fla. 1953)
- Ambrosio Martinez v. State, 76 Fla. 159 (Fla. 1918)
- Riley v. Hattie Mae Jackson, 246 So. 2d 625 (Fla. 3d DCA 1971)