RALPH HUGHES, D/B/A R.E.D. JEWELRY AND COIN EXCHANGE, APPELLANT,
v.
SECURITY ENGINEERING, INC., APPELLEE

Fla. 4th DCA | 1981-12-02
No. 81-129
LETTS, C. J., and ANSTEAD and HERSEY, JJ., concur.
406 So. 2d 1225 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1981) Caution
Cited by 11 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on the authority of L. Luria & Son, Inc. v. Alarmtec International Corporation, 384 So. 2d 947 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980).

LETTS, C. J., and ANSTEAD and HERSEY, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By (11 total)

  • …ent, all of those cases, save one, either contain no discussion suggesting that the jurisdictional basis for the appeal was in dispute or involve orders which would not otherwise be appealable at a later date. The sole exception is Mogul v. Fodiman, 406 So. 2d 1225 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981). In Mogul, the court, with little discussion, concluded that rule 9.130(a)(4) “appear[ed] broad enough to permit an appeal from” an order denying a motion seeking a protective order to prevent certain discovery in a supplementary…
    1 / 2
  • Exceletech, Inc. v. S.W. Williams, 579 So. 2d 850 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991)
    …as a party to proceedings supplementary and that the trial court erred in denying its motion to quash service of process upon it. We have jurisdiction of this appeal pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130(a)(4). See Mogul v. Fodiman, 406 So. 2d 1225 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981). In its brief the appellant contends: As a matter of law, prior to implead-ing any party, the trial court should conduct an examination of the judgment creditor or appoint a Master to do this for it. Section 56.29(2), Florida S…
  • GACHÉ v. First Union Nat'l Bank OF Fla., 625 So. 2d 86 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993)
    …otions for new trial in jury and non-jury cases are reviewable by the method prescribed in rule 9.110. Other non-final orders entered after final order on authorized motions are reviewable by the method prescribed by this rule. In Mogul v. Fodiman, 406 So. 2d 1225 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981), the fifth district concluded that the last sentence of the above provision allowed an appeal to be taken from a discovery order in a supplementary proceeding because it was an order entered after final judgment. See also, Largo…
    1 / 2

Previewing 3 of 11 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw