W. B. SHELBY CRICHLOW AND LILLIAN C. CRICHLOW, HIS WIFE, APPELLANTS,
v.
MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY, A CORPORATION UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Florida Supreme Court affirmed a lower court's order but later amended the affirmance to allow appellants to file further pleadings. The court found no error in the initial order.
The Florida Supreme Court initially found no error in the Circuit Court's order and affirmed it. Subsequently, the court amended its judgment to permit the appellants to file additional pleadings.
“it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said order; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the Court that the said order of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.”
This quote reflects the court's initial finding and decision to affirm the lower court's order.
Previewing 1 of 2 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAppellants, W. B. Shelby Crichlow and Lillian C. Crichlow, appealed an order from the Circuit Court. The case involved Maryland Casualty Company. The …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Amendment Of Judgment cases and more on FLexlaw
This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the order herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said order; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the Court that the said order of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.
Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Davis, J.J., concur.
Order Amending Judgment of Affirmance.
Entered December 11, 1931.
It is considered, ordered and adjudged by the court that the judgment of affirmance heretofore entered in above cause of October 23, 1931, be amended by adding thereto the following language: “With permission to the appellants, defendants in the court below, to file such further pleadings or proceedings in said cause as they may be advised within such time as may be fixed by said Circuit Court.”
All Concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Crichlow v. Md. Cas. Co., 116 Fla. 226 (Fla. 1933)…was granted and reargument had. The basis of such rehearing was the order of this court entered December 11, 1931, in connection with a prior appeal from an order overruling a demurrer to the bill of complaint. See Crichlow v. Maryland Casualty Co., 103 Fla. 267, 137 Sou. Rep. 276. The order of December 11, 1931, amended the judgment of affirmance by giving permission to the defendant to file further pleadings in the cause upon remand to the court below. Inasmuch as the appeal from the order overruling the…1 / 2
-
Donaldson v. Stokes, 128 Fla. 93 (Fla. 1937)…On Rehearing. Per Curiam. This case is before us on petition for rehearing. The petition for rehearing is. denied, but on authority of Crichlow, et ux., v. Maryland Casualty Co., 103 Fla. 267, 268, 137 Sou. 276, the judgment of affirmance by this Court is hereby amended to read: ... The order appealed from is affirmed with leave to the Appellants in the court below to apply to the Circuit Court for an order fixing a reasonable time with…