ANDREW CRAWFORD, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Reinhart v. Seaboard Coast Line R.R. Co. & State of Fla. Dep't of Transp., 422 So. 2d 41 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982)
  …nagement, Inc. v. Tampa Wholesale Liquor Co., 374 So. 2d 626 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979). If any reasonable interpretation of the evidence supports the plaintiff’s claim, the court must deny the defendant’s motion. Charlotte Asphalt, Inc. v. Cape Cave Corp., 406 So. 2d 1234 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981). We think this is particularly important in Florida where the doctrine of comparative negligence applies. Contrary to the trial court’s conclusion that appellant was relying only on prior accidents, there was additional sufficient…
• Holt v. Calchas, LLC, 155 So. 3d 499 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015)
  …eadings is withdrawn from the jury’s consideration when the evidence establishes without conflict that the moving party is entitled to judgment on the issue as a matter of law.") (emphasis added); see also Charlotte Asphalt, Inc. v. Cape Cave Corp., 406 So. 2d 1234, 1236 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981) (citing Hartnett v. Fowler, 94 So. 2d 724 (Fla.1957)) (explaining that motions for directed verdict in jury cases or involuntary dismissal in nonjury cases are governed by the same principles). Payment History Hearsay Objec…
• Colson v. State Farm Bank, 183 So. 3d 1038 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015)
  …s that the Wolkoffs moved for judgment on the pleadings. The court treated the motion as one for involuntary dismissal. See Salauddin v. Bank of Am., N.A., 150 So. 3d 1189, 1190 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014) (citing Charlotte Asphalt, Inc. v. Cape Cave Corp., 406 So. 2d 1234, 1236 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981) (explaining that motions for directed verdict and motions for involuntary dismissal at a nonjury trial are governed by the same principles)). It is only by virtue of a motion to dismiss or motion for directed verdict that th…

Authorities Cited

• Brooker v. State, 362 So. 2d 697 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978)
• Shemwell v. State, 391 So. 2d 218 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980)