ADERHOLD, WARDEN,
v.
ENGLAND

5th Cir. | 1934-10-16
No. 7513
73 F.2d 91 Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (1934)
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

By this appeal the warden of the Atlanta Penitentiary contends that the district judge erred in computing deductions from a second *92sentence imposed upon appellee, a prisoner in the penitentiary. The facts upon which the District Court acted are not shown by the petition, or by any evidence in the record.

It follows that the judgment must be, and it is, affirmed.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw