JOSE R. LOPEZ, APPELLANT,

v.

AMOURIE LLORENS AND CARMEN LLORENS, APPELLEES

Citator

Cited By (13 total)

• United States Tel. Co. v. State, 410 So. 2d 1002 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982)
  …la. 4th DCA), cert. denied, 249 So. 2d 689 (Fla.1971); Farmers & Merchants Bank v. Vocelle, 106 So. 2d 92 (Fla. 1st DCA 1958). In the case before us, as in Cosmo Personnel Agency of Fort Lauderdale, Inc. v. Department of Labor & Employment Security, 407 So. 2d 249 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981), the company was concerned with profits and exerted no effective control over the salesmen. The Deputy’s findings of fact compel a determination that the salesmen were independent contractors. For these reasons, the order appeal…
• D.O. Creasman Elecs., Inc. v. State of Fla. Dep't of Labor & Emp. Sec., 458 So. 2d 894 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984)
  …without supervision held to be independent contractor even though telephone company furnished office space and clerical assistance without charge); Cosmo Personnel Agency of Fort Lauderdale, Inc. v. State, Department of Labor & Employment Security, 407 So. 2d 249 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981) (employment counselors deemed not to be employees of employment agency despite the furnishing of secretarial help, office space, and phone service, the use of the employment agency’s trade name, and the fact that either party cou…
• VIP Tours OF Orlando, Inc. v. State, 449 So. 2d 1307 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984)
  …The court concluded that United States Telephone Company was concerned with profits and exerted no effective control over its salesmen. In Cosmo Personnel Agency of Fort Lauderdale, Inc. v. State of Florida, Dept. of Labor and Employment Security, 407 So. 2d 249 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981), Cosmo was a licensed employment agency which contracted with persons licensed as employment clerks for their services as employment counselors. The employment contract required two weeks training without pay. Following this, eac…

Authorities Cited

• Moore Meats, Inc. v. Strawn, 313 So. 2d 660 (Fla. 1975)
• Carola D. Allen v. In re The Est. of Ellen C. Dutton, 394 So. 2d 132 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980)